News

Budget deal clears crucial vote in Senate

Budget deal clears crucial vote in Senate

BUDGET BATTLE: House Budget Committee chairman Representative Paul Ryan (R-WI) (C) and Senate Budget Committee chairman Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) (R) hold a news conference to introduce The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013. Photo: Reuters

By David Lawder

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A two-year U.S. budget deal on Tuesday cleared a Senate procedural vote that all but assured its passage by a simple majority later this week in the Democratic-controlled chamber.

The Senate voted 67-33 to limit debate on the measure, exceeding the required 60 votes and overcoming the opposition of conservative Republicans who objected to increased near-term government spending.

Twelve Republicans joined 53 Democrats and two independents in supporting the measure, which aims to minimize the threat of another government shutdown through October 1, 2015. It won passage in the House of Representatives by an overwhelming margin last week.

A 16-day partial government shutdown in October left many Republicans skittish about withholding their support for legislation to keep agencies operating.

The Senate, where Democrats have a 55-45 majority, is expected to vote on final passage of the budget measure as early as Wednesday.

Several conservative Republican senators, including Tea Party supporters Rand Paul and Ted Cruz, tried to stop the measure and keep automatic “sequester” spending cuts in place. The budget deal eases some of the sequester cuts by allowing budgets for government agencies and discretionary programs to rise by $63 billion over two years in exchange for future savings elsewhere.

But a mix of moderate and conservative Republican senators voted to proceed to an up-or-down vote on the deal, which was negotiated by Democratic Senator Patty Murray and Republican Representative Paul Ryan.

The margin of victory is expected to be close on the final vote, however. Senator Lamar Alexander, a Republican from Tennessee who faces a tough re-election primary challenge, voted “yes” on the procedural question but said he would ultimately oppose the deal.

“I will vote against the budget agreement because it avoids the federal government’s most urgent need: reducing the growth of runaway entitlement spending,” Alexander said in a statement.

The measure sets spending levels ranging from the military to national parks at just over $1 trillion for two fiscal years. Assuming it wins final passage and is signed by President Barack Obama, Congress must then pass a spending measure that allocates funds by January 15 when current government spending authority expires.

Recent Headlines

17 minutes ago in Local

Monarch Butterfly Population Is Shrinking

Fresh
monarch butterfly

Official state insect needs milkweed

yesterday in Local

Durbin’s War Chest Swelling

durbin

Senator Dick Durbin’s latest campaign report says he’s got more than $6 million in the bank for his re-election bid…

yesterday in Local

Lt. Gov. Pushing for Wider Acceptance of LINK Card

shelia-simon

Lt. Gov. Sheila Simon is not done trying to get technology to accept Link cards into all of the state's farmers' markets

yesterday in Local

Sherman Plans Road Improvements

road construction

The Village of Sherman has finished studying what roads in town need work, and it's compiled a list available for public inspection.

yesterday in Local

Renewed Push for More Casinos

Updated
bob rita

Two proposals: one for one new casino; the other for five